http://www.newsmax.com/adv/moore/

Mike Moore is a lying fat tub of vile goo

Look at his audience
Fags, Perverts, Socialists, Atheists and Lesbians

All members MFUP-"Mentally ****ed up people"

"JJ" > wrote in message
...
>Mike Moore is a lying fat tub of vile goo
>
>Look at his audience
>Fags, Perverts, Socialists, Atheists and Lesbians
>
>All members MFUP-"Mentally ****ed up people"

It's always refreshing when ignorant, blustering, bigoted hatemongers drop
the compassionate facade and display their agenda in its undisguised
ugliness. People like you help mobilize votes against Bush, so I hope your
tantrums persist.

Roger Friedman, Fox News(!):
"As much as some might try to marginalize this film as a screed against
President George Bush, 'F9/11'--as we saw last night--is a tribute to
patriotism, to the American sense of duty--and at the same time an
indictment of stupidity and avarice."

--Gary

"Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
news:EsdDc.119671$0y.18327@attbi_s03...
> "JJ" > wrote in message
> ...
> >Mike Moore is a lying fat tub of vile goo
> >
> >Look at his audience
> >Fags, Perverts, Socialists, Atheists and Lesbians
> >
> >All members MFUP-"Mentally ****ed up people"
>
> It's always refreshing when ignorant, blustering, bigoted hatemongers drop
> the compassionate facade and display their agenda in its undisguised
> ugliness.

Were you speaking of JJ or Michael Moore? Or both?

"C J Campbell" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
> news:EsdDc.119671$0y.18327@attbi_s03...
> > "JJ" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >Mike Moore is a lying fat tub of vile goo
> > >
> > >Look at his audience
> > >Fags, Perverts, Socialists, Atheists and Lesbians
> > >
> > >All members MFUP-"Mentally ****ed up people"
> >
> > It's always refreshing when ignorant, blustering, bigoted hatemongers
drop
> > the compassionate facade and display their agenda in its undisguised
> > ugliness.
>
> Were you speaking of JJ or Michael Moore? Or both?

Even some of Moore's usual detractors have been writing respectfully about
his latest film (as in the Fox News review I quoted). JJ is unlikely to
inspire respect from anyone to the left of the Klan.

--Gary

Accept perversion or be labeled a Klansman according to the left and
Democrats.
What was it the bible said? Right will become wrong and wrong will
become right near the end?
The left and Democrats use the words Klan, Bigotry etc. when you do
not accept the left babbling PC tyranny and perversion

Oh well, we know who will burn in hell and who won't when judgment day
comes.
I just do not want my tax dollars spent on fag parades and gay pride in
the FAA
Another ILS or a few more Radars would be dollars better spent

So you think it's OK for a man to stick his dick in another man's
asshole Gary?
Just curious.

Gary Drescher wrote:

>"C J Campbell" > wrote in message
...
>
>
>>"Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
>>news:EsdDc.119671$0y.18327@attbi_s03...
>>
>>
>>>"JJ" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Mike Moore is a lying fat tub of vile goo
>>>>
>>>>Look at his audience
>>>>Fags, Perverts, Socialists, Atheists and Lesbians
>>>>
>>>>All members MFUP-"Mentally ****ed up people"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>It's always refreshing when ignorant, blustering, bigoted hatemongers
>>>
>>>
>drop
>
>
>>>the compassionate facade and display their agenda in its undisguised
>>>ugliness.
>>>
>>>
>>Were you speaking of JJ or Michael Moore? Or both?
>>
>>
>
>Even some of Moore's usual detractors have been writing respectfully about
>his latest film (as in the Fox News review I quoted). JJ is unlikely to
>inspire respect from anyone to the left of the Klan.
>
>--Gary
>
>
>
>

"JJ" > wrote in message
...
>
> Oh well, we know who will burn in hell and who won't when judgment day
> comes.

To put it bluntly, JJ, if God desires to throw people into Hell that is His
business. "Satan" means "the Accuser" or "Prosecutor," if you are bucking
for that job.

"JJ" > wrote in message
...
>
>What was it the bible said?

Well, some of my personal favorites are that eating shellfish is an
abomination (Lev 11:11); that a sacrificed goat's kidneys should be burned
on an altar (Lev 3:16); and that it's alright to enslave people who don't
share your religion (Lev 25:44). But the newfangled political-correctness
fad seems to have instilled doubt about these commandments.

>Oh well, we know who will burn in hell and who won't when judgment
>day comes.

Let me guess: Republicans get safe passage on the Mothership,
Democrats are damned, and Libertarians go into limbo until someone
can sort them out.

>I just do not want my tax dollars spent on fag parades and gay pride
>in the FAA. Another ILS or a few more Radars would be dollars better
>spent

I see. In your universe, the FAA spends as much on gay matters (by sending
an email memo) as it would cost to implement a new ILS. Moreover, you
don't notice that the FAA promotes safety (as well as fairness) by opposing
discrimination against competent employees on the basis of their
sexual orientation.

>So you think it's OK for a man to stick his dick in another man's
>asshole Gary?

Only with permission. Why do you ask?

>Just curious.

Apparently.

--Gary

"Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
news:5JkDc.185985$Ly.70885@attbi_s01
>
> Even some of Moore's usual detractors have been writing respectfully
> about his latest film (as in the Fox News review I quoted).

You quoted Roger Friedman. While he does get a paycheck from Fox News, he
is not a conservative nor is he a "usual Moore detractor."

--
John T
http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer
http://www.pocketgear.com/products_search.asp?developerid=4415
____________________

"Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
news:xSoDc.121926$Sw.103486@attbi_s51...
> "JJ" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >What was it the bible said?
>
> Well, some of my personal favorites are that eating shellfish is an
> abomination (Lev 11:11); that a sacrificed goat's kidneys should be burned
> on an altar (Lev 3:16); and that it's alright to enslave people who don't
> share your religion (Lev 25:44). But the newfangled political-correctness
> fad seems to have instilled doubt about these commandments.
>

That argument does not wash with Christians, who consider the Mosaic Law
fulfilled in Jesus Christ. That is why we call it the "New" Testament.

In many ways, the Christian requirements are more strict than the Mosaic
Law. Where before you could not commit adultery, now you cannot look upon
another with lust. Where before you could not kill, now you cannot be angry.
Where before there were Mosaic rules regarding the slave trade, now each man
should be treated as your brother. Where before you had to sacrifice goats'
kidneys or pigeons, now you have to give to Christ all that you have, even
your heart. The Mosaic Law ruled your actions. The Christian Law rules your
intentions. It makes all the difference in the world.

Truly, there is little room for homosexuality or any other form of sexual
exploitation in Christianity. JJ misquoted Paul in his letter to Timothy,
but the point is that God will be the judge of what and who is good and
evil, not you, or JJ, or me. The doctrines and philosophies of men count for
nothing.

"C J Campbell" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
> news:xSoDc.121926$Sw.103486@attbi_s51...
> > "JJ" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> > >What was it the bible said?
> >
> > Well, some of my personal favorites are that eating shellfish is an
> > abomination (Lev 11:11); that a sacrificed goat's kidneys should be
burned
> > on an altar (Lev 3:16); and that it's alright to enslave people who
don't
> > share your religion (Lev 25:44). But the newfangled
political-correctness
> > fad seems to have instilled doubt about these commandments.
>
> That argument does not wash with Christians, who consider the Mosaic Law
> fulfilled in Jesus Christ.

I can assure you that many Christians still quote Leviticus (albeit very
selectively) to bolster their positions. And it is quite a stretch to
construe "fulfillment" of Mosaic law as the *repeal* of that law--especially
when Jesus explicitly affirmed the continuing validity of the Pharisees'
Mosaic authority (Matthew 23:3). But the Bible's longevity is due largely to
this sort of ambiguity, which allows people of widely varying philosophies
to conclude that their personal creeds are actually the will of God.

> In many ways, the Christian requirements are more strict than the Mosaic
> Law. Where before you could not commit adultery, now you cannot look upon
> another with lust...
> The Mosaic Law ruled your actions. The Christian Law rules your
> intentions. It makes all the difference in the world.

So is it now an abomination even to *want* to eat shellfish? :)

Seriously, though, a growing number of Christian denominations are formally
sanctifying gay unions precisely because, as you say, the New Testament
emphasizes intentions; and the intentions of a loving couple, living
together and raising children, are the same regardless of the genders involv
ed.

--Gary

C J Campbell wrote:

> "Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
> news:xSoDc.121926$Sw.103486@attbi_s51...
> > "JJ" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> > >What was it the bible said?
> >
> > Well, some of my personal favorites are that eating shellfish is an
> > abomination (Lev 11:11); that a sacrificed goat's kidneys should be burned
> > on an altar (Lev 3:16); and that it's alright to enslave people who don't
> > share your religion (Lev 25:44). But the newfangled political-correctness
> > fad seems to have instilled doubt about these commandments.
> >
>
> That argument does not wash with Christians, who consider the Mosaic Law
> fulfilled in Jesus Christ. That is why we call it the "New" Testament.
>
> In many ways, the Christian requirements are more strict than the Mosaic
> Law. Where before you could not commit adultery, now you cannot look upon
> another with lust. Where before you could not kill, now you cannot be angry.
> Where before there were Mosaic rules regarding the slave trade, now each man
> should be treated as your brother. Where before you had to sacrifice goats'
> kidneys or pigeons, now you have to give to Christ all that you have, even
> your heart. The Mosaic Law ruled your actions. The Christian Law rules your
> intentions. It makes all the difference in the world.
>
> Truly, there is little room for homosexuality or any other form of sexual
> exploitation in Christianity. JJ misquoted Paul in his letter to Timothy,
> but the point is that God will be the judge of what and who is good and
> evil, not you, or JJ, or me. The doctrines and philosophies of men count for
> nothing.

What does all this have to do with IFR flying?

"John T" > wrote in message
ws.com...
> "Gary Drescher" > wrote in message
> news:5JkDc.185985$Ly.70885@attbi_s01
> >
> > Even some of Moore's usual detractors have been writing respectfully
> > about his latest film (as in the Fox News review I quoted).
>
> You quoted Roger Friedman. While he does get a paycheck from Fox News, he
> is not a conservative nor is he a "usual Moore detractor."

Perhaps not the most vehement detractor, but Friedman has criticized Moore
for past excesses that Friedman does not find in the latest film.

--Gary

> wrote in message ...
>
> What does all this have to do with IFR flying?
>

Oh, very well. :-)

But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they
shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and
they shall walk, and not faint. (Isaiah 40:31)

The FAA promotes safety by forcing the vast majority of their hard
working "Moral" people to
shut up and accept perverted lifestyles? I personally know from many
sources the FAA
is in turmoil. The social engineering is out of control and many
experienced people especially white
heterosexual males are leaving in droves.

In "your" universe, if the loss of highly trained people is promoting
safety and "fairness", we are in trouble.
Homosexuals make up a very small portion of the population. What if
pedophiles and bestiality was
deemed "OK" by the social engineering PC thought police? Would that
"promote" safety in the aviation system?
What about the fairness to moral and christian people who are disgusted
by perverted behavior?

I know of a FAA Regional office that hung a Gay pride banner in a
Government facility but REFUSED to
allow a Christian or Christmas banner. Is that fair in "your universe"?

The bottom line is our Federal Government endorsed by Democrats is
becoming an immoral **** hole

>
>
>
>>
>>
>
>I see. In your universe, the FAA spends as much on gay matters (by sending
>an email memo) as it would cost to implement a new ILS. Moreover, you
>don't notice that the FAA promotes safety (as well as fairness) by opposing
>discrimination against competent employees on the basis of their
>sexual orientation.
>
>
>
>
>

C J Campbell wrote:

> > wrote in message ...
> >
> > What does all this have to do with IFR flying?
> >
>
> Oh, very well. :-)
>
> But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they
> shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and
> they shall walk, and not faint. (Isaiah 40:31)

Oh CRAP!

In article >, "C J Campbell"
> wrote:

> > What does all this have to do with IFR flying?
>
> Oh, very well. :-)
>
> But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they
> shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and
> they shall walk, and not faint. (Isaiah 40:31)

Thank you.

--
Bob Noel

JJ > wrote in message >...
> http://www.newsmax.com/adv/moore/
>
> Mike Moore is a lying fat tub of vile goo


http://www.michaelmoorehatesamerica.com/

The NEW "Roger and Me"!

Bob Noel wrote:

> In article >, "C J Campbell"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>>What does all this have to do with IFR flying?
>>
>>Oh, very well. :-)
>>
>> But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they
>>shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary; and
>>they shall walk, and not faint. (Isaiah 40:31)
>
>
> Thank you.
>

It doesn't say that the eagles are flying in the clouds, however! :-)

Matt

"Matt Whiting" > wrote in message
...
> Bob Noel wrote:
>
> > In article >, "C J Campbell"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>What does all this have to do with IFR flying?
> >>
> >>Oh, very well. :-)
> >>
> >> But they that wait upon the LORD shall renew their strength; they
> >>shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run, and not be weary;
and
> >>they shall walk, and not faint. (Isaiah 40:31)
> >
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
>
> It doesn't say that the eagles are flying in the clouds, however! :-)
>
> Matt
>
They don't have to be IMC to be IFR.
But they do need a clearance.
:-)
H.

"H. Adam Stevens" > wrote in message
nk.net...
>
> They don't have to be IMC to be IFR.
> But they do need a clearance.
> :-)
> H.
>

They don't need a clearance in Class G airspace.

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

>
> "H. Adam Stevens" > wrote in message
> nk.net...
> >
> > They don't have to be IMC to be IFR.
> > But they do need a clearance.
> > :-)
> > H.
> >
>
> They don't need a clearance in Class G airspace.

That'd be Class G for "God" airspace, in this case? :>

Brian.
(not a Christian myself, but there's some very good poetry in the King
James; I like Genesis 1 a lot as poetry)

Dude, you are SO in the wrong newsgroup...

Apparently you're a pilot - I sincerely hope we never share the same
airspace.

By the way - have you considered that you're overcompensating for your
deeply repressed desires to Sodomize and Gomorrahrize, not to mention an
even more deeply hidden wish to be a Democrat?? This bears some personal
examination on your part, methinks.

Dave Blevins


On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 14:55:07 -0400, JJ > wrote:

>The FAA promotes safety by forcing the vast majority of their hard
>working "Moral" people to
>shut up and accept perverted lifestyles? I personally know from many
>sources the FAA
>is in turmoil. The social engineering is out of control and many
>experienced people especially white
>heterosexual males are leaving in droves.
>
>In "your" universe, if the loss of highly trained people is promoting
>safety and "fairness", we are in trouble.
>Homosexuals make up a very small portion of the population. What if
>pedophiles and bestiality was
>deemed "OK" by the social engineering PC thought police? Would that
>"promote" safety in the aviation system?
>What about the fairness to moral and christian people who are disgusted
>by perverted behavior?
>
>I know of a FAA Regional office that hung a Gay pride banner in a
>Government facility but REFUSED to
>allow a Christian or Christmas banner. Is that fair in "your universe"?
>
>The bottom line is our Federal Government endorsed by Democrats is
>becoming an immoral **** hole